environment jobs Est. in 1994. Delivering Environment Jobs for 30 years
This job listing is no longer active.
Please use our Environment Jobs Search to find current vacancies.
Title | Environmental/Resource Economist, Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) |
Posted |
|
|
Description |
Background
The Lake Victoria Climate Change Action Plan was agreed by the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Uganda in November, 2007. Among others, the Heads resolved that Commonwealth governments and the Commonwealth Secretariat should play their full part to implement shared goals and envisaged actions, working in strategic partnership and conjunction with other international institutions, raising awareness, facilitating access and sharing best practice. This statement reinforced the proposals made in February 2007, by the Commonwealth Environment Ministers who welcomed a Commonwealth Programme of Work on Climate Change. In fulfilment of this mandate, the Commonwealth Secretariat has approved a technical assistance project aimed at supporting the South Pacific Environmental Programme SPREP capacity building initiative on climate change adaptation within the Pacific Region.
The Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC identified small island states as being among the countries in the world most vulnerable to the adverse impacts of climate change. This vulnerability is exacerbated by the countries’ geographical characteristics. Coupled with non-climate drivers, such as inappropriate land use, overexploitation of resources, increasing urbanization and population increase, development in the region is increasingly undermined. Climate change and extreme weather events disrupt food production, water supply and the economies of Pacific island countries. Future climate projections, although approximate for the region, are bleak and, in particular, indicate reduced food security, especially at the household level.
Primary food sources (agriculture, fisheries and forests) and water are all expected to be negatively impacted by climate change. For the low lying atolls, the likely economic disruption from climate change pressures could be catastrophic and potentially lead to population relocation and therefore social and cultural disruption and disproportion. Failure to reduce vulnerability may result in loss of future risk management opportunities when impacts may be greater and options fewer. Pacific island countries are thus expected to have difficulty achieving their national development goals, including the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and climate change is expected to further stunt this development. In some cases, climate change is expected not only to slow but even undo socioeconomic development in the region.
The issue of climate change has been recognized at the highest level of government in the Pacific islands. At a Pacific Islands High Level Consultation meeting which took place in Nadi-Fiji on the 14-16 May 2002, attended by Ministers and Senior Officials of the Finance, Planning, and Environment Ministries, it was agreed that climate change, climate variability and sea-level rise was not just an environmental, but also an economic, social, and political issue. The impacts, and in particular the related economic and social shocks, pose serious political and national financial management issues for Pacific Island countries. Climate change, climate variability and sea-level rise adversely affect GDP, balance of payments, budget deficits, foreign debt, unemployment, social services and living standards.
Apart from the realisation that economic risk management needs to be incorporated as part of the Pacific’s adaptation to climate change, very little has progressed in terms of commitment and high level leverage to deal with these issues. Several impediments stand in the way and foremost is the limited insight into the economic ramifications of climate change impacts, as well as in cost/benefits of adaptation measures. Therefore, this study is timely as it addresses an existing gap in the Pacific Islands Framework for Action on Climate Change, enhances the Pacific’s negotiating position by making available data on the economic impacts of climate change and help elevate the climate change issue at the domestic policy level of Pacific governments.
The Pacific Regional Economic Climate Change Study
Following the release of the Stern Review, the UK Government, has continued to provide technical support to a number of economics of climate change studies around the world in the form of Regional Economics of Climate Change Studies (RECCS). The rationale for this support from the RECCS is based on the understanding that the RECCS are critical in dispelling myths and clichés that could threaten to prevent a global deal. They can help to produce an understanding to aid policymakers, businesses and consumers in making long-term decisions and ultimately in shaping a framework for climate action.
The studies can also act as a catalyst for engagement with key influencing constituencies on the economics of climate change in a more informed way, relating experience and evidence to local contexts; enhance engagement between developed and developing countries particularly to break the deadlock and identifying what incentives different countries had to engage in a global deal; and have significant wider relevance in stimulating debate in the region. In some cases, the RECCS feed directly into national policymaking and negotiation strategies at international fora such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This is very likely to be the case with the Pacific RECCS.
Several studies on the economics of climate change have been undertaken in the Pacific region but most tend to be backward-looking, in that they can only study past experiences and extrapolate this into the future. The RECCS process could add real value in undertaking an economic analysis with more informed projections based on the latest science and an estimation of the economic cost (and opportunities where they exist) of climate change in the region. Crucially, this work will be undertaken, taking into account the various possible scenarios being considered by the international community, and assessing and quantifying the impacts on the Pacific region from these possible mitigation target scenarios. This linkage to the international negotiations is where the RECCS add significant value to economic analysis, and the results would also provide the region with a more powerful voice in these fora.
To date, RECCS have been undertaken in South America, the Caribbean, Asia and Africa. These studies intend to consolidate global data under a framework of principles (that is, adapting the Stern methodology to local contexts), so that the costs and benefits of climate change can be compared across regions. Preliminary discussions between SPREP and SOPAC indicate that this is an opportunity not to be missed and would only serve to strengthen climate change work in the region. In order for this work to be coordinated in a systematic and programmatic approach, a coordinator will be needed.
Objective of a Pacific RECCS
Methodology The Pacific RECCS would be undertaken in three phases. Phase I is a technical feasibility study, including a stock-take of current programmes, and a scoping exercise to draw up the mandate and TORs for phase II. Phase I assessment would include:
From the results of Phase I, a detailed Phase II proposal for a Pacific RECCS would be developed. Some elements of the Phase II that will already be identified from Phase I include:
A technical design workshop, involving key experts, on the development of a detailed RECCS project (including a log frame, expected timeline and budget for Phase II) will be undertaken as part of Phase II planning. Phase III will focus on building capacity within the region to ensure appropriate responses based on the findings of the RECCS study can be mainstreamed into government policy options and responses to mitigation and adaptation. The specific activities of this phase will be shaped by the findings of phase II Outcome/output of a Pacific RECCS:
In detail, the following outputs will be produced: Phase I
- Terms of Reference for a full Pacific RECCS - Appropriate arrangements for the organisational management of the project, technical coordination and budget - Identification of the appropriate stakeholder-based process to be used to develop a program of research activities for the respective agencies
Phase II
Phase III · Practical mainstreaming guidelines for integrating climate change into national development plans and policies; · A series of training modules for international negotiators and policymakers on the results of the Pacific RECCS; · A capacity building programme designed to tackle skills shortages identified in Phase II of the RECCS. Management Arrangements
Several partners are already involved in this study, which include the Commonwealth Secretariat, the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme’s SPREP, British High Commission (Suva and Wellington) and the South Pacific Applied Geosciences Commission (SOPAC).
As Lead Agency for the coordination of climate change activities in the Pacific region, SPREP will coordinate administrative arrangements for the activity. The British High Commission Wellington and Suva have assisted the process by introducing SPREP and SOPAC staff to the Stern workshops and the Stern Team. They have also continued to provide technical and funding advice as they see fit. The Commonwealth Secretariat will be assisting the process by supporting a Resource Economist position that will be placed at SPREP to coordinate the RECCS study and other related Activities
The secondment contributes to the Comsec Programme of Work on Climate Change commissioned by the Commonwealth Environment Ministers in February 2007 and the Lake Victoria Climate Change Action Plan agreed by the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Uganda also in November 2007. Strategic Guidance
Strategic guidance for the development and execution of the project will be provided through a Steering Committee established for the preliminary assessment. The Project Steering Committee will comprise representatives from SOPAC, SPREP, IUCN, ComSec, and a Stern Team representative. At the executive level, the Steering Committee members will provide technical assistance on the execution of work by assisting in the identification of and/or access to materials relating to climate change in the Pacific. At a more strategic level, the Committee will be responsible for reviewing project progress (including drafts of work) and providing feedback. SPREP will Chair the Steering Committee and convene meetings. It will liaise very closely with SOPAC on the technical aspect of the Pacific RECCS initiative and it may involve other partners with appropriate technical expertise. SOPAC may sub-contract parts of the preliminary assessment. At present, SOPAC houses the largest number of economists amongst CROP thus this technical expertise will be critical in the development of the RECCS. Main Duties and Responsibilities
The incumbent will be the main co-ordinator of this study when in placement. The project has three distinct phases. Phase I will already be underway by the time the Lead Resource Economist begins duties. Therefore the position will commence at the transitional period between Phase I and Phase II, drawing on lessons from the scoping study and designing the programme of work for the full RECCS. Phase III will be expected to run simultaneously with Phase II to address some of the skill and capacity shortages highlighted through the study.
Phase II
Phase III
Specific tasks will include: Phase II
Phase III
The Expert will be expected to develop a plan of action to be agreed by SPREP and the Commonwealth Secretariat within two months of his/her taking up the position.
Qualifications and Experience
(Note: Applicants who had submitted their application previously need not re-apply again.) Interested applicants must be nationals of Commonwealth member countries are invited to apply enclosing a detailed CV with names and contact details of three referees via e-mail to the attention of: Mr James Lek |